Cause and Effect... Super Spatial Interactions

Good day,

Happy New Yew to come!

 

Examining the idea of a fourth spatial dimension as cause and a three dimensional space with a fourth dimension of time as effect as opposed to the space/time four dimensions typically used by Big Bang Theorists and even Einstein's constructions yields an even stronger reconciliation of perceived data. I am inclined to concede that even a fifth dimension of space maybe viable. However beyond that it would seem that a larger variety of natural phenomena would have to be readily apparent.

Most of my conclusions have to do with the study of the nature of electrical current, not as the simple fluctuation of electrons, but as energy in all of its transformations. I took the wide range of particle and wave theories with their formulas and bombarded as much raw data as I could with them during the late 1970’s and early 1980’s so by the fall of 1983 I was acquainted enough to recognize that Einstein had fallen short on the application of his theories and relativity not necessarily because of not recognizing the concepts, but because of the bulk of mathematics that is required to straddle not only Newtonian and Quantized nuclear mechanics, but thermo-electro-harmonics of charged stratified gaseous and solid matter.

The first questions that came to mind that was not already answered came about when isolating a single particle/wave packet, weather it originated within the perceived phenomena, or traveled through the prescribed domain. The first subject of question that I quarried was: “Is there something that can travel faster than the speed of light?” Of course there is a particle that travels faster than light, since all of our experimental observational means are limited by ‘observance’ i.e. light is the ‘fastest’ medium through which we record data, then it is impossible for anything traveling ‘faster than light’ to be recorded. A catch ‘22’ since calibration cannot be achieved.

An example would be lightning and thunder. If you can only hear, i.e. you can’t see, you would never know that the light of the electrical discharge ever happened, and the distance from the strike to the observer would be measured the shock wave through the medium of the air. During the development of supersonic aircraft there were numerous problems that had to be overcome with the instrumentation to function properly when the craft achieved sonic velocity and higher.

Unlike the supersonic aircraft and ‘faster than light’, where the knowledge of light traveling faster than sound allowed for recalibration, the nature of ‘faster than light’ travel cannot be measured since we do not have a proper reference frame to measure it.

Neutrinos or their existence is calculable and has been for a long time. This was the first ‘particles’ or ‘wave packets’ that I gleaned, but of more importance if neutrinos exist then electrons have to travel at an even higher magnitudes of velocity. The ‘electron cloud’ or the quantized paradox of a single ‘body’ being more than one place in time indicate that ‘observation’ of ‘faster than light’ velocities create ‘optical’ illusions.

Why people think that ‘faster than light’ velocities are a violation of physics’ law or Einstein’s theories is purely a misunderstanding of what Relativity is eluding towards. These not construct of relative magnitudes, but the perception of various magnitudes of one reference frame and a different reference frame in order to reconcile the individual reference frames with each other. These reconciliations are the basis of the unification of fields (week, strong, electric, magnetic, and such).

What are the conditions of observation? That is the question Einstein and many others have been working on puzzling out. Although there was much I could perceive by recognizing a fourth dimensional space being disseminated into the popular 3-D space/time misrepresentation it was not until the summer/fall of 1985 that I was able to recognize the mistakes built into calculus that made Newton reluctant to publish and solve them.

It was tricky, and various modern arithmetic proofs done after Newton helped point the way of a solution and proof of a corrected version which was both arithmetic and geometric. Before actuating this new mathematical procedure, along with the strike accounting of physics of subatomic to astrological, I ran various calculations of certain proposed high profile facilities.

Unfortunately when these calculations were made along the lines of the prevalent ideas of the Big Bang Theorists the more accurate mathematics led to catastrophic results. In order to maintain a clear conscious I destroyed any and all related research notes, calculations, proofs, conclusions, and all. I am in no means trying to re-render these findings. I merely hope that these writing will yield to more clear minded thinking and a higher standard of social responsibility to future scientists.

Peace,

Stephen A. Halkovic III

What is the Time.... is there a backdrop?

Good day,

And on the wave of the year coming to a close, really, what's that all about? Happy, Happy!!

This is still more background on debunking the Big Bang Theory (BBT) concerning the Universe, this might take some time... Perhaps this all seems like jousting at windmills... Honestly what do they mean by saying; 'It all started...'

There weren't even cavemen, Neanderthal or otherwise, to paint it on the wall; Stellar graffiti? but again, where did the wall come from.

First cause is not observable, and non-verifiable.

This is a simple, but unshakable Truth, and the very nature of being "first". Most of the BBTs have a discussion of "first" being the thrust that they know. Some will reference that this is not the 'first big bang' and try to elude this unsettling dilemma. This assumption does address some of the short comings, but ignores the fact that subsequent big bangs cannot occur which is something I will have to address another day. Now concerning Cosmology, most cultures (okay all cultures) have a first cause, usually revealed to humans by a Divine figure of various sorts. A lot of these Firsts have to do with the Earth and Heavens being shaped in differing fashions from one or two Divine beings. Most BBTs first have nothing to do with a Divine body associated with the cataclysmic event which gives them the nick-name 'Big Bang'.

There is a very prevalent influential religion that has the Divine figure beyond the Heaven and Earth. The Judaic tradition indicates that the Creation of Heaven and Earth is the deliberately initiated by God casting the shadow of his image or spirit on the surface of space (in keeping within scientific terminology). I was raised Catholic, and had Jewish friends, so this is the most familiar for me, and when compared to a wide variety of other test, scientific, religious and others, is the most credible when the facts are taken into account. Another note on the first chapter of the book of Genius (or the First Books of Moses) concerning the 'Evolution Theory' which claim an almost identical path of "evolution" as the sequence of days in the order God had created Life on the Earth. This is very relevant since the BBT and “Evolution” theories correlate themselves together in their mutually shared time line.

OH! You might think I'm one of those 'Creationist' nutters, Take a deep breath and count backwards from ten, and see if you can look at this from a different perspective than that of a religious zealot. If you rail against a religion it's your own mental hang up, not mine. I'm not saying anyone is going to Hell or any other such misconception that some try to impose upon others. What I am introducing is an idea of relevance of an extraordinary power of magnitude that neither the BBT nor the 'Evolution' theory can touch.

 Many have fallen for an old anti-Semitic propaganda ploy. Anti-Semites have used lies to attack Jews by slander, thus justifying later violence against them. Christians have also been victimized in this manner (although it is true this is the root of all racial/religious bigotry it is specifically relevant to these two religious groups in this discussion). The BBT and the Theory of Evolution have become anti-Semitic and anti-Christian.

Another note about the discussion concerning time lines is the extremely lengthy time line can in no way be verified. It will take a several billion years in order to provide any discernible evidence to support it. Everything that has been offered as 'proof' is merely circumstantial and speculative at best (these will be addressed later). As far as 'evolution' is concerned it has been shown time and time again that variation actually exists within the 'genetic coding'. Through an unknown process the egg discerns which sperm will penetrate and fertilize it. Likewise, it may also be that the sperm may actually decide which sperm will be the one to enter first. Maybe it is a combination of the two. There is research in localized environment impact on variety selection. If this is of interest to you might take a look into a link between temperature and sex of the Tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus), an endangered lizard native to New Zealand, as an example.

My interest as a scientist had rested in the development of efficient low impact energy sources. So I am very interested in the possibility of energy ratio of a six day time frame of Cosmology verse the several billion years proposed by the BBTs. The dynamics of such resolution of a materialized Universe is staggering compared to the BBT being relatively benign. I suppose the possibility that the Universe being this amazingly dynamic is too much for most to comprehend. That maybe there is some other sources of energy even more closely 'guarded' than that from mater.

What is the First cause? The idea is that this Universe did not come from an event of 3-dimensional space in a time. But a residual effect from a 4th or 5^th (I haven’t seen any reason to rule one or the other out) dimensional space experiment designed for a 3-D effect. True, even more unsettling, but it doesn't take much intelligence to recognize there is a God.

So the “spirit” of God over the 'experiment' really isn't that far fetch when compared to the "26 dimensions" (which is only possible if time was more like a tadpole and since no one has yet to run into themselves in any significant account 5 dimensions seem only plausible) some have supposedly proved. Math is simply a language of sorts. And it is possible to write a believable story of fiction and it is of fact. Many will argue that it is actually easier to write fictitious scenario than to write a factual piece. What I have seen of these is more that mathematically these can be figured, calculated and such, but by no means actually carries any proof of a True 26th dimensional space.

If the Universe erupted into being then in the ‘First’ case there would be no friction. Being never used distribution would occur more like water out of a tap. The gravity and water pressure forcing it abruptly against the bowl. When gravity does overcome as forming matter accretes ‘friction’ would form as the pooling water in the sink and not as the bowl. It is not until then when wave dynamics can manifest. Then there can be transformation and rapidly congeal into masses cool enough and large enough to be matter eventually bounded by the speed of light. Then it can be seen that stellar and planetary bodies did not have to travel billions of years, but manifested locally from a ‘spacial ocean’ decelerating suddenly into celestial bodies.


As you can see there is a considerable backdrop to flush out here and I will have to continue later.

May Peace sustain you in this transition to the new calendar year,

Stephen A. Halkovic III

Time, the Universe, and Everything.... A Little Background First

Good day,

This is a serious attempt to wake up those in the World 'Scientific' Community. Hopefully, okay it’s the Hail Mary football pass.

Seriously, there are problems with the 'Big Bang Theory' concerning the Universe. Problems present ever since it was first presented. Unfortunately, contrary to true scientific process, this bad idea didn't get thrown out, and subsequently really spoiled almost every associated field of science concerning 'Physics'. The only bigger gaff, a real pervert of science, is the 'Theory of Evolution'.

The amount of money alone being used to try to validate these two atrocities of modern science is embarrassing. The inability of the World's 'scientific' Community to see beyond these is sad, truly pathetic, like those who insisted the world is flat, and the Earth is the center of the Universe. This is the order of the stubbornness in the close minded following of these two theories. Having studied Astrophysics, I know, I've seen it!

In the mid-eighties I decided to write a paper on what I have been able to figure out as far as Unifying Gravity with the Unified Field Theories of the time. I got busy researching any and all applicable available information, theoretical and experimental. I was attending Indiana University and since they had a linear accelerator and telescope (although relatively small I will admit) access to the most current information and older papers was no problem.

The first thing I noticed was how far short their theories fell from Einstein's ideas regarding space and matter; whether they are bounded or unbounded, and infinite or finite. Einstein’s theories are predicated on these relationships, so their failure to compose a theory that was in an agreement with Einstein’s then they had rejected all of his works since matter and space are principle concepts.

The second concern is the biggest problem. I found that it was prevalent throughout the data and analysis relevant to Cosmology via astrological examination. Almost every postulated theory and their formulas fell far short of the actual data that was obtained. Scientists were not only overlooking relevant data which indicated their theories were incorrect, but they were also backing each other up in this process. A scientific community bonded together by a 'Code of Silence'.

That really didn't bother me at the time. I saw the pattern they couldn't. I thought I could profit by publishing my own insights and theories. However, after arming myself with the facts and coming to the mathematical conclusions, I came to a startling reality. The only application that could come from any theory in the hands of those subscribing to the 'Big Bang Theory' can only lead to massive destruction.

A theory that begins and ends in an explosion can only yield massive destruction!

This follows a fundamental idea of psychology and philosophy. Cosmology is the root of any religion. Since modern science does not have; a moral/ethic code or credo reflecting a dogma and theology that I am aware of, I do not think of these as religious. I don't believe this to being any sort of religion or condemnation of any religion, although there may be individuals without a religious consciousness who may disagree. I look at both of these 'bad' ideas of science merely as sloppy thinking that no one has bothered to clean up.

Because of various reasons I have not written about these matters and recently have come to a personal place in my life when I should address these critical flaws in the fields that I had enjoyed.

In subsequent posts I hope to encourage those interested and involved in the 'World Scientific Community' to make strides towards clearing away these misconceptions of science and restore to the world a sane and responsible scientific community.

 Peace,

 Stephen A. Halkovic III